I always liked the Savini-directed Night of the Living Dead, which I saw first run theatrically in 1990, then on VHS, then on DVD. Here's a few reasons why (numbered 1-4; skip them to the next numbered list, below, if you're impatient to get to the "comparison" section, but rest assured, I'm just long winded; there are no ads on this blog, so it's not like I'm trying to draw you into scrolling past them; this is actual writing about the film, not just filler!).
Note: I don't have a 4K player so all of this is based on the blu-ray in the package, which contrary to some early reports, does have both versions of the film.
Reasons to Love the Savini NOTLD:
1. The incongruity of "colourful daytime zombies" is pleasing; for much of the film's runtime, the palette is the warmest, brightest, and most cheerful of any zombie movie ever. I gather there was a blu-ray release awhile back that tried to darken it up but this, obviously, was a mistake. The new steelbook edition retains the original palette. The colours are bright and pleasing. A pleasure to see.
2. I am a fan of Patricia Tallman, who is familiar, I gather, to Star Trek nerds, but who for me will ever be the daughter of the "fat slob jerk" in Knightriders, which is a Romero I adore (fans of Stephen King should note, he has an early cameo as Hoagie Man; fans of Ed Harris should note, it's a great early role; and fans of Tom Savini should note, it's his meatiest role as an actor, as the hero's friend/ nemesis). While I like Knightriders better than NOTLD 1990, I think NOTLD has a stronger role for Tallman. While the Barbara of the original NOTLD is a screaming, annoying mess, Tallman brings a power and dignity to this role, and accomplishes brilliant things with her facial features even during the scenes where her character is the most traumatized and least able to speak. Ben asks her if she knows who any of the people in the house are, early on, and she shudders, blinks and grimaces in a way that speaks volumes, wordlessly communicating that, "No, I don't know who these people are or what's wrong with them or what the fuck is going on and I can't believe any of this is happening and now I have to answer your demanding, shouted questions and could someone just make this all STOP?" Which is a lot to communicate with a shudder, blink and grimace; it's right up there with some of Howard Sherman/ Sherman Howard's work as Bub in Day of the Dead (AKA "the most expressive/ emotive zombie in zombie history"). Much of her best work in NOTLD 1990 is done without dialogue (see also: the despair in the way she blinks when Ben tells her his truck is out of gas). Her transformation into a fighter I suspect is a precursor for the transformation of Carol in The Walking Dead. Tallman runs some sort of life coaching/ self-improvement program now; I wonder if any of her classes involve self-improvement through surviving a zombie attack?
The way she scoffs at the idiot rednecks in the film at the end is terrific, too. One of my favourite female characters in horror movie history!
3. But the rest of the cast is great, too. Everyone's good, but the names deserve their stature within the genre: there's Tony Todd of Candyman, Tom Towles of Henry Portrait of a Serial Killer, and Bill Moseley (of several Rob Zombie films, but also Chop Top in Texas Chainsaw Massacre II. My only complaint with his role in this film is, it's too small!). William Butler who plays Tom went on to a long career as a director, but I don't know many of his films (Madhouse and Demonic Toys are titles that are familiar to me but I haven't seen them. There's a horror series based around a character called Baby Oopsie? What?).
4. Tom Towles, the king of the basement, offers a great portrait of The American Asshole. American Assholism is in full swing of late, so his final scene in the film should please everyone. There is clearly some sort of revisitation of race relations, dealt with in the original, in the remake, but I'd argue that it is subordinated to the male/ female dynamic and the feminist aspects of the film (see point 2 above); stuff about race was no longer as pressing in 1990, maybe? I'll leave it to others to compare and analyze these elements--race relations and feminism in NOTLD 1990--but they're not incidental to the pleasures of the film.
Sad to read that we lost Tom Towles to a stroke ten years ago -- didn't realize he was dead until I was writing this (or else noted it at the time then forgot). Apparently (like Lance Henriksen) he got his start in Dog Day Afternoon, though his part is smaller and he is uncredited. RIP, sir.
5. There's a fun retro score that brings in elements of the scores to other films in the Romeroverse, most notably when we see the Emergency Broadcast System warnings and things get all Goblinesque, referring to the music that oozes through the scenes in the panicked TV station in Dawn of the Dead. That's a nice bit intertextuality!
There are also non-musical cross-references, too, like the newscaster being played by actual Pittsburgh TV personality Bill Cardille, whose daughter, Lori, stars in Day of the Dead. Didn't know that until today, either!
There were also limitations to the film, obviously, mostly due to censorship. The version that screened theatrically in 1990 was weirdly without much gore for a movie directed by Tom Savini; if I gather correctly, scenes were cut to secure an MPAA R-Rating, so the film could play in mainstream theatres (which it did; I saw it in one). There are a couple of other minor quibbles (especially noticeable in the blu ray, you can see the Uncle Regis zombie breathing as he lies inert against the couch), but the lack of gore was the main detraction, so to speak. Now that the there is an expensive steelbook 4k/ blu-ray reinstating 12 seconds (!) of that gore to the film, it seems worthwhile to put a clear post into the world saying WHAT has been reinstated and where. The differences between cuts:
1. While both the theatrical version and the uncut version begin in black and white, for the shot of the moon seen through trees, the black and white in the uncut cut persists to the first zombie attack in the cemetery. The sudden shift to colour is jarring, which both contributes to the jump-scare and the element of distraction. TBH I think it's unnecessary -- the theatrical cut is fine for this; we get so little of Bill Moseley in the film that I want to see him in colour. But whatever!
2. The first gore re-addition to the film, I think, occurs when Barbara takes down Uncle Regis with a fireplace poker. After he crumples, there is a shot of his face as Tallman struggles to remove the hook of the poker from where it is caught in his skin. It's only about a second, but a worthy addition!
3. In the "You shot Mr. Magruder" scene, about 51:35 into the film, where Tallman dispatches a zombie who looks a bit like Jim Jarmusch, a shot has been reinstated of the bullet hitting the back of his head and the splat of blood on the floor. Very brief!
4. Just after the 52 minute mark, there's that bald/ half-naked zombie that Tallman shoots several times to illustrate that the shots are having no effect: "Is he dead?" BLAM. "Is he dead?" BLAM. "Is he dead?" The final shot is the headshot, and Savini was not allowed to show the exit in the theatrical version, which involves a rather large spray of gore. Not quite sure how they censored it -- the scene seems to play at the same length, the splat is just not there. Did he have to do a re-shoot? Did he somehow just remove that element? We're not talking CGI here, so I'm not entirely sure, but the uncut edition has a noticeably wet headshot. It is more, shall we say, Savini-like?
[Note: I have now watched some of the DVD commentary mentioned below--not the blu-ray commentary-- and can report the answer: they actually prepared two versions of the scene, anticipating that the MPAA might object to the planned splat. So when the MPAA did object, they just used the alternate version].
5. This is the biggie. Around the 1:03 mark, there's a scene where Tom is in the back of the pickup, about to head out on the ill-fated run to the gas pumps, when a zombie approaches. In the theatrical cut, we see that zombie approach, and Tom stands in the bed of the truck and takes aim and fires his shotgun. Then we move on. In the uncut version, again, we see the whole effect of the shot: the zombie's head disappears in a large dark splat. You might argue that the scene was gratuitous, but I'd disagree: it illustrates for people who don't know their guns that Tom is using a shotgun, not a rifle, which is relevant to why his trying to shoot the lock off the gas pump, a few minutes later, is CLEARLY A BAD IDEA.
We figure that out anyhow, though.
One note: as far as shotgun-blast-to-the-head special effects go, this particular one has nothing on Savini's work in Maniac, and isn't as potent as that very brief one in Dawn of the Dead, even if its better-realized, because that Dawn of the Dead splat was historical, right up there with Scanners. It is his third best shotgun splat, maybe? It's not like the one in Maniac, where the person whose head he obliterates is his OWN. That's the you-gotta-see-this effect in Savini's body of work -- no?
In sum, it's really not much that has been reinstated -- no other differences that I spotted, though there might be another extended splat or two. [Edit: it's a spoiler, so skip the rest of this line if you haven't seen the film, but there's a Tom Towles headsplat too that is much bloodier, at the film's climax; I missed it when first writing this. There are other headsplat exit wounds in the uncut]. I'll leave it up to the reader to form their own conclusion if it's worth the pricetag (was actually cheaper on Amazon than in-store; sorry, stores!). The movie looks great, and it's one I've always loved, so I'm happy to have bought it, even though it's only a handful of scenes that play differently.
It is, however, worth noting that some confusion has spread online about runtimes, with IMDB and other websites giving the theatrical cut a 95 minute runtime, while the allegedly uncut version is just slightly over 88 minutes long -- which is also the length of the theatrical version on the blu-ray set. So where is this 95 minute version? This isn't a Coen brothers movie, so how do you get a director's cut that's shorter than the original? But I think that what's being reported online is just an error: I broke out my DVD to check the runtime of that, and it is also slightly over 88 minutes long. I doubt a 95-minute long cut ever existed for human consumption. If it did, it is none of these.
One good thing came of my putting the DVD into my player, though. I double-checked the commentary by Savini and it's completely different from the commentary track on the blu-ray, which means I guess I gotta keep the DVD (which is a bitch because my Romero shelf is pretty crowded and now I hafta fit two discs on it, not just swap, but I'll figure out something). It sounds like a fun commentary track on said DVD, having just Savini on it (which I prefer to these chattier, podcast-like multi-person tracks, which seems to be what you get on the blu). He's soft-spoken and appealing, as ever, and we learn, for example, on the DVD commentary that the "Is he dead?" zombie is actually a Pittsburgh cab driver. Don't you want to know stuff like that? I do!
I'm home sick with COVID, so I think I'm going to watch that commentary now, and then if I have time, I'll watch the other one. I'm pretty happy with this package. There are extras, too -- featurettes and such -- but I'll have to get to those later... hope this post helped someone!























.jpg)




































